Stucknut Sports Forum  
  Home   Forum   Login Register | Radio Live Show Feeds NFL Pool Locker  

September 10, 2010, 02:25:04 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The NFL Pool is sponsored by AllProScience.com.  Rack them.
 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Expand the NCAA Tournament?  (Read 1221 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
John in The Cuse
-Treasurer-
-Member-

Karma: 389
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709
Member # 7134


People said his brain was infected by devils


View Profile
« on: December 09, 2009, 12:41:29 pm »

Some talk out there about the possibility of expanding the field from 64 to 96 teams with the top 32 teams receiving byes...

http://www.syracuse.com/have-you-heard/index.ssf/2009/12/should_the_ncaa_expand_the_men.html

Boheem likes it LOL

What do you think?

I think it would be fun you could have a little mini-tournament for the mid-majors. Also more games, more fans happy, more money. Win-win no?
Logged
Sponsored Link

Guests: Sign up to hide banners
talinc
Party of NO guy
-Member-

Karma: 574
Offline Offline

Posts: 3083
Member # 5363


kkkinc


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 12:42:28 pm »

Yeah man, f*ck the NIT.  uhh
« Last Edit: December 09, 2009, 12:53:56 pm by talinc » Logged
Gene in the D
Tarding up the world, one chat board at a time!!!
-Nutter-

Karma: 429
Offline Offline

Posts: 3543
Member # 1771


WWRRD??


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 12:44:00 pm »

why not just make it a 200 team tourney so every facking team in the NCAA can make it...

What are they doing following Gary Beckman and the NHL protocal.... let's have everyone except like 4 teams make the playoffs...

that's what the NIT is for... all the f*cktard programs that don't matterenough to get the national exposure in the big tourney!
Logged
Jokey
I don't need no instructions to know how to ROCK!
-Member-

Karma: 569
Offline Offline

Posts: 6821
Member # 2730


Queering don't make the world work!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 12:46:27 pm »

why not just make it a 200 team tourney so every facking team in the NCAA can make it...

What are they doing following Gary Beckman and the NHL protocal.... let's have everyone except like 4 teams make the playoffs...

that's what the NIT is for... all the f*cktard programs that don't matterenough to get the national exposure in the big tourney!

Actually only 16 of the 30 NHL teams make teh playoffs...
Logged
talinc
Party of NO guy
-Member-

Karma: 574
Offline Offline

Posts: 3083
Member # 5363


kkkinc


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2009, 01:29:03 pm »

How awesome would March April May Madness be?  Banana Bang Kool Aid
Logged
GGT
Greg From Michigan and BACK in the Hell that is Omaha Nebraska
-Nutter-

Karma: 618
Offline Offline

Posts: 6141
Member # 3682


# of Tards Greg Has No Use For---10 as of 1/27/10


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2009, 01:35:08 pm »

Unless they let everyone in some half assed school with 16 wins over Parapalegic University or Blind State College is going to bitch because they didn't get invited.  I think 64 teams is plenty.  They can do away with that stupid 65/66 team team play in as well.  What does that prove?  No matter what when they post the bracket you can usually only point to 8 or 10 teams with a legit shot at winning the title any way.
Logged
John in The Cuse
-Treasurer-
-Member-

Karma: 389
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709
Member # 7134


People said his brain was infected by devils


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2009, 01:50:00 pm »

Logged
Absinthe
[ban'em][delete'em]
-Nutter-

Karma: 441
Offline Offline

Posts: 2591
Member # 5954


{USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST}


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2009, 01:55:50 pm »

I think it is good the way it is, at 64 teams. The underdogs and small conference winners still get in and get their shot that way, some lately have been making some ridiculous upsets (see 13th seed Siena's upset over 4th seed Vandy last year, 14th seed Northwestern State's upset over 3rd seed Iowa in 2006, and 13th seed Bradley's upset over 4th seed Kansas also in 2006.)  These upsets don't usually lead to long tourney runs by these low seeds though. I think George Mason's Final Four appearance as an 11th seed in 2006 is one of the few exceptions. We really don't need to expand the field. The way it is set up right now still gives all the small schools their shot.
Logged
spencerinclarkcounty
Wordsmith
-Member-

Karma: 418
Offline Offline

Posts: 823
Member # 5434


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2009, 01:59:35 pm »

I'm fine with it the way it is, many small schools can still get in. It would be fun to expand the tourney and watch the elitist basketball pricks (Bilas, Dukie V and the like) get pissed, but I don't want May Madness...
Logged
wireman
-Member-

Karma: 88
Offline Offline

Posts: 1384
Member # 1010


I ride therefore; I am


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2009, 02:00:45 pm »

this is what the regular season is for; to play your way in especially if you don't have a conference tourney.  having 96 teams is way to many teams.  as a fan of the defending national champs i wouldn't worry about my team getting in.  
Logged
Jeff in Syracuse
(I)
Mod

Karma: 447
Offline Offline

Posts: 5222
Member # 1026


jeff13164
View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2009, 02:00:59 pm »

I like it at 64 errrrrr, 65.  It would turn into a bit of a clusterf*ck if it went more than that.  Maybe 68 would be it, have the 8 lowest teams play in prelim games, but at this point I'm not in favor of anything more than that
Logged
Brock in DC
Will fucking cut you
-Nutter-

Karma: 1844
Offline Offline

Posts: 17213
Member # 1852



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2009, 02:01:54 pm »

They should shorten it to two teams: UNC and whatever team you think is #2.
Logged
Jeff in Syracuse
(I)
Mod

Karma: 447
Offline Offline

Posts: 5222
Member # 1026


jeff13164
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2009, 02:31:23 pm »

They should shorten it to two teams: UNC and whatever team you think is #2.

AHEM AHEM 

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/boxscore?gid=200911200553

 Popcorn
Logged
Chris in H-Town
Ethan's Point Guard
-Nutter-

Karma: 1041
Offline Offline

Posts: 6152
Member # 22


NFL Pool Champ 2005


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2009, 03:23:19 pm »

Does anyone but degenerate gamblers watch the NIT anyways? bad basketball

folding more garbage teams waters down the product..expanding just makes that 64th ERR 65th teams cinderella appearance that less meaningful.

Stick with the current format..

Screw filling out a bracket with over 100 teams in it...
Logged
John in The Cuse
-Treasurer-
-Member-

Karma: 389
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709
Member # 7134


People said his brain was infected by devils


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2009, 03:38:41 pm »

Does anyone but degenerate gamblers watch the NIT anyways?

Not unless their team doesn't make the NCAA...

Screw filling out a bracket with over 100 teams in it...

AMEN to that  Referee 2
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 21 queries.
Home | Forum | Ethan © 2010 Stucknut, All Rights Reserved. Sitemap | Rss | Mobile | Disclaimer